| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
Big Wullie
Joined: 25 Apr 2007 Posts: 1149
Location: Glasgow
|
Posted: Sat Jun 13, 2009 2:34 am Post subject: Edinburgh Uni Do Not Support Freedom Of Speech |
|
|
My Wife & I attended Edinburgh University (The Raeburn Room Old College) to hand out leaflets about my case on Thursday
The reason for targetting this room inside the Uni was simply : There was a conference in Honour of Sir Gerald Gordon QC who sat on the board of SCCRC when they investigated my case 2001-2004.
http://www.law.ed.ac.uk/conferences/gordon/
We were told that someone complained of us standing at the only entrance to the Raeburn Room and were asked to go and ask for permission at the office of public relations who refused our request to stand within their grounds.
Two security guards appeared to make sure we left their property.
We could not stand at the main entrance to the Uni at South Bridge Street as scaffolding was being erected at the three entrances so we left.
So much for "Freedom Of Speech" and "Right To Roam Laws"
We returned later at 6pm for a Question Time with Bill Aitken, Robert Brown, Richard Baker and Angela Constance which was open to anyone with no need to book in advance, though I had sent two e-mails enquiring if there was any space available for my wife and I but got no answer.
See E-Mails here:
FW: Question Time Event
From: wullie beck (wulliebeck@hotmail.co.uk)
Sent: 11 June 2009 04:38:07
To: enquiries@sccjr.ac.uk
Hi
Because I have had no response to my e-mail enquiry of Tuesday 9th June 2009 please find it has again been forwarded here.
Thanks ever so kindly in anticipation.
Mr & Mrs William Beck
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
From: wulliebeck@hotmail.co.uk
To: enquiries@sccjr.ac.uk
Subject: Question Time Event
Date: Tue, 9 Jun 2009 22:31:16 +0000
Dear Sir/Madam
Can I possibly reserve two seats for the question time event at 6pm on Thursday 11th June 2009 on the Criminal Justice & Licensing (Scotland) Bill, in Lecture Theatre 175 of Old College.
Thanks In Anticipation
Mr & Mrs William Beck
________________________________
As I also understand matters someone else asked if there was any places available and they got an immediate response saying a seat was booked for them without even asking for one to be reserved.
"I wonder if the name Beck is "Flagged" up in their offices to ignore" ?
http://www.law.ed.ac.uk/conferences/gordon/questiontime.aspx
http://www.law.ed.ac.uk/conferenc...don/files/questiontimeleaflet.pdf
We all wrote our questions on a piece of paper and they had an hour and a half to answer all the questions.
My feelings are that instead of just picking random pieces of paper from the box they had already sorted the questions into perspective and order of asking, My paper came out second last, after a short speech that they might not get through all the questions.
Before the questions were asked all the board left the room with the box for at least ten minutes before returning hence the theory they had sorted out the questions.
Anyway they had plenty of time and when it came to my question I was asked if it had any relevance to the Criminal Justice Bill being discussed and after clarifying I had indeeed submitted some proposals for change I asked my Question:
Why is there no-one within the criminal justice system who deals with complaints levelled at members of the SCCRC and was this something the Justice Committee could look at.
There was some shaking of heads and shrugging of shoulders I must say and Bill Aitken answered saying this was not a simple straightforward issue and involved changing legislation which was not simple in itself.
Surely the proposals for change should be able to take on board this serious matter that a public body has no-one to whom appellants could complain.
Even our highest Judge in the country can be complained about.
Bill Aitken's answer really just confirmed for me they (The Justice Committee) would not entertain such complaints against this organisation yet they as Justice Committee have the responsibility to investigate matters of Justice.
Once again my targets were met.
We were able to hand Sir Gerald Gordon and some other delegates my leaflet and ask a question of Bill Aitken who keeps ducking my E-mails alomng with Richard Baker and Robert Brown.
I also got an opportunity to speak to the organiser James Chalmers who has done a review of Referred cases by SCCRC and ask him, in fairness should he not do a review of Non-Referred cases also, and handed him a copy of my Dossier which had been sent to Kenny MacAskill.
His review can be found here:
http://www.sccrc.org.uk/ViewFile.aspx?id=393
_________________ http://justiceforwulliebeck.webs.com/index.htm
http://williambeck.blogspot.com/
http://williambeck.wordpress.com/about/ |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
scotkaz

Joined: 28 Aug 2008 Posts: 527
|
Posted: Sat Jun 13, 2009 9:42 am Post subject: |
|
|
You fairly get around Wullie and Louise:)
Fair play to you both for your tireless and dogged determination to clear your name.
I am glad you got the chance to put your questions to these people and in public . They might not want to answer the questions but other people in the audience also would have heard the questions being asked and not given a proper answer. Would make other people think about it to.
Your review is here: http://justiceforwulliebeck.webs.com/complainttomacaskill.htm for anyone who wants to see it.
You are a thorn in their side Wullie. Carry on being one because you are making a difference. You get up and do what you have to do and you support so many other people in everything you do. Keep up the excellent work. ! hugs
xx |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Big Wullie
Joined: 25 Apr 2007 Posts: 1149
Location: Glasgow
|
Posted: Sat Jun 13, 2009 4:55 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Hi Scotkaz
Thanks for your comments.
The way I see it, to protest is to take it to their front door.
Sir Gerald Gordon actually took a leaflet from my Wife with a smile on his face probably expecting it to be something about him given the conference was in honour of him.
It was great to watch them squirming in anticipation of my question coming out, Just me being present made them uncomfortable.
Anyone thinking of protesting should do the same and watch for events coming up where the targets of their protests will be present.
There was only one entrance into the Raeburn Room so they all had to pass us and by the time people questioned us we had already handed out leaflets to people entering the conference.
A look at the delegates list shows the people attending, which were not many, only one page which can be viewed here:
http://www.law.ed.ac.uk/conferences/gordon/delegates.aspx
As well as Gerald Gordon having sat on the SCCRC Robin Johnston was present though his name does not appear to be attached to SCCRC but Fiona MacLean's does who has had nothing to do with the commission for years.
Robin Johnston is the person who dealt with my case as Senior Legal Officer within SCCRC (Very Badly I Must Add)
I am sure that Kenny MacAskill must do surgeries as well as Alex Salmond and the likes so anyone wanting to get their messages across to these people should do the same and meet them at their surgeries where there is nowhere for them to escape, Just a bit of advice for anyone with complaints.
If people really want to reach these people they should go for it, what is stopping them. _________________ http://justiceforwulliebeck.webs.com/index.htm
http://williambeck.blogspot.com/
http://williambeck.wordpress.com/about/ |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
scotkaz

Joined: 28 Aug 2008 Posts: 527
|
Posted: Sat Jun 13, 2009 6:41 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Wullie I have been working on a site to help people campaign. It is a work in progress and if anyone has any links to add to it please let me know.
http://www.howtocampaign.webs.com/ |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Big Wullie
Joined: 25 Apr 2007 Posts: 1149
Location: Glasgow
|
Posted: Sat Jun 13, 2009 10:25 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Scotkaz
What a great idea to help people understand how to campaign.
I am sure many will take some help and ideas from the site you have made and perhaps set up their own campaigns.
I have found the following which will be very useful:
In Glasgow people will respond to posters and come over asking what the protest is about and take as much info you can give them.
In Edinburgh they turn their noses up and are less keen to get involved in protests but are likely to take leaflets from people who appear to be well dressed and nicely spoken.
Different places different cultures.
I am sure many on this forum would just love the opportunity to get to ask some politicians questions like myself, Questions from Politicians and MSPs who for many years have ignored the interests of their constituents and the likes.
Go for it, set your sights and aims and just go.
Perhaps it is time for all to come together and support each other which is possible and to do one campaign at a time.
Rise up and be counted anything is possible _________________ http://justiceforwulliebeck.webs.com/index.htm
http://williambeck.blogspot.com/
http://williambeck.wordpress.com/about/ |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
scotkaz

Joined: 28 Aug 2008 Posts: 527
|
Posted: Sat Jun 13, 2009 11:51 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Quote: | | Perhaps it is time for all to come together and support each other which is possible and to do one campaign at a time. |
Wullie
I have been saying the exact same thing for years.
Individuals can resist injustice, but only a community can do justice
Working together shows that there is unity and power in numbers. We all want the same thing............truth and justice.
I recall saying to American campaigners years ago that perhaps they should all work together and fight each case or campaign as it is needed. IE if there was an appeal or execution date for someone then EVERYONE focused on that campaign even if it was only to send emails to the relevant places. It didnt mean they couldnt carry on campaigning for their own person. Well some people got all knocked out of shape and didnt want to do this, they wanted to run their own campaign only. Which of course is their perogative but they could not see the bigger picture at all.
And the person sitting in prison wants as many people to know about their plight as possible. The prisoner is also the one suffering in jail.
The person being hurt by campaigners not wanting to work together is the one whom the campaign is all about at the end of the day.
We did eventually set up a Working Together email group and it did work pretty good, with everyone chipping in as was needed. Funnily enough the ones who wanted to go on their own merry way saw how good it was working and wanted help with their campaigns.
Perhaps we could be doing with a Working Together committee and focus on the cases which are at the most urgent stages as is needed?
I really do think that us in Scotland really need to get motivated and get our backsides into gear and actually do something about what is happening.
The last real demo I saw in Glasgow was a huge march for the Glasgow Two and there was a rally with speakers in George's Square too which was brilliant. But that was so long ago.
We need to get back to this kind of protest, and kick start the public into seeing that Miscarriages of Justice are STILL happening.
Of course everything should be peaceful. People power needs to come back and everyone really does need to work together and support one another in this fight for freedom and justice for everyone who suffers a miscarriage of justice.
I know it would take some organising but it can be done. I know it can. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
david
Joined: 01 Mar 2009 Posts: 52
Location: edinburgh
|
Posted: Mon Jun 15, 2009 12:06 am Post subject: edinburgh morality |
|
|
wullie
Not surprised people in Edinburgh are less willing to take leaflets etc than their Glasgow counterparts.
I firmly believe that innocent people have more of a chance being found innocent by a Glasgow jury compared to an Edinburgh jury too. Edinburgh morality is different. Police officers don't lie, women don't have sex with more than one man at the same time and so on. Glaswegians are more robust in spoting lies.
I believe that if my trial was in Glasgow then I would have got a not guilty.
David |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Big Wullie
Joined: 25 Apr 2007 Posts: 1149
Location: Glasgow
|
Posted: Mon Jun 15, 2009 1:16 am Post subject: |
|
|
David
I agree with you entirely.
The people of Edinburgh still think everyone in Glasow runs about with Open Razors, hence some of Glasow's major trials are now taking place in Edinburgh and the likes where they are more likely to be found guilty. (Under the guise of protecting Witness's and Jurors)
Keep up the fight, I truely believe in your case and hope the Innocent hurry up and take up your case.
You could I believe go back to the Commission with the other issues we have found, and I would be willing to help you lodge other grounds on these issues if you wanted to.
_________________ http://justiceforwulliebeck.webs.com/index.htm
http://williambeck.blogspot.com/
http://williambeck.wordpress.com/about/ |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|