shirleymckie.myfastforum.org Forum Index shirleymckie.myfastforum.org
To allow readers to post comments on current issues related to the Shirley McKie case
 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   Join! (free) Join! (free)
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 


Peter Tobin & Circumstancial Evidence - Right or Wrong?

 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    shirleymckie.myfastforum.org Forum Index -> Test Forum 1
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
Fiscal



Joined: 23 Dec 2008
Posts: 111


Location: Edinburgh

PostPosted: Sun Dec 28, 2008 4:13 pm    Post subject: Peter Tobin & Circumstancial Evidence - Right or Wrong? Reply with quote

Peter Tobin & Circumstancial Evidence - Right or Wrong?

Discuss



_________________
Mr Fiscal
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
scotkaz



Joined: 28 Aug 2008
Posts: 527



PostPosted: Sun Dec 28, 2008 5:51 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I think in Tobin's case, the police finally got it right.

The evidence in the case was very powerful. Circumstantial evidence is not always great but in this case it worked well. It doesn't always work out so well. I personally do not like cases based on circumstatial evidence.

When you put all the evidence in this case together, it is compelling evidence that proves his guilt. there can be no other explanation for all the evidence against him.


In 2006 they discovered that Tobin lived in 11 Robertson Avenue, Bathgate, when Vicky went missing.

11 days after Vicky went missing her purse was found. The purse was dry and its contents were intact.  The purse was tested years later and DNA matched Peter Tobin's three year old son.

Tobin then swapped council houses with a couple at 50 Irvine Drive, Margate, on the Kent coast.

Tobin was witnessed digging a big hole in the garden by a neighbour. He tells the neighbour he is building a sandpit.  The neighbour asked about the lack of a sandpit. Tobin made excuses to the guy about social services saying it was not recommended for his son.

The search at 11 Robertson Avenue gave a dagger with DNA matching Vicky on it.

Vicky's body was found in the area Tobin was digging to build his "sand pit"

On one of the bin bags wrapped around the body were four fingerprints.

They belonged to Tobin.

Intimate swabs from the body, which appeared to contain Tobin's DNA, also suggested a serious sexual assault.


So its a slam dunk case of guilt and I do not think there is anyone out there who believes otherwise.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
W.Roughead



Joined: 25 Oct 2008
Posts: 120


Location: Scotland.

PostPosted: Mon Jan 05, 2009 12:54 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Apologies for late reply here.,

I totally agree that Peter Tobin is guilty.  Furthermore, it would not surprise me if at some point he is further implicated in unsolved cases.



_________________
“Send not to know for whom the bell tolls – it tolls for thee.” John Donne.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    shirleymckie.myfastforum.org Forum Index -> Test Forum 1 All times are GMT
Page 1 of 1

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum

Card File  Gallery  Forum Archive
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
Create your own free forum | Buy a domain to use with your forum
Thanks to everyone who has supported Shirley over the years.High Paying Adsense List|Web directory