shirleymckie.myfastforum.org Forum Index shirleymckie.myfastforum.org
To allow readers to post comments on current issues related to the Shirley McKie case
 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   Join! (free) Join! (free)
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

The free forums are now under new ownership, a full announcement will be made shortly
SCCRC IS NOT A PUBLIC AUTHORITY, OOPS, YES, YOU ARE!

 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    shirleymckie.myfastforum.org Forum Index -> Test Forum 1
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
Please Register and Login to this forum to stop seeing this advertising.






Posted:     Post subject:

Back to top
SCCRC MOJ SELL BY DATE



Joined: 09 Mar 2015
Posts: 19



PostPosted: Sun Aug 23, 2015 3:30 pm    Post subject: SCCRC IS NOT A PUBLIC AUTHORITY, OOPS, YES, YOU ARE!  Reply with quote

In current legal proceedings, the SCCRC have responded by stating they are NOT A PUBLIC AUTHORITY FOR THE PURPOSES OF THE HRA'98 - They immediately changed position on receipt of the following response:-

"Within the response by Defender 1 to the Scottish Human Rights Commission Consultation Paper this public body has responded on points ‘material’ to its function which includes, “The SCCRC is a PUBLIC AUTHORITY and as such it would be open to applicants to allege that the SCCRC had violated human rights in the determination of an application to the SCCRC…The SCCRC believes that a decision on human rights issue in a criminal case may impact on civil law. An example of this is the decision concerning temporary sheriffs. in Starrs v Ruxton 2000 J.C. 208..” The aforesaid SCCRC submission on human rights is at complete odds with their ‘answers to the initial writ’, which claims they are not a public authority in such human rights context."

In response to an approx. £695,000 DAMAGES WRIT, founding upon their breach of duty, malpractice and gross negligence in public office, it is incredible they do not even know they are a public authority or is this just another deceitful attempt not to be accountable?!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
nugnug



Joined: 15 Feb 2010
Posts: 1341


Location: london

PostPosted: Mon Aug 24, 2015 6:18 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

they seem to be a bit confused about what they are mind you there not the only ones.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Yahoo Messenger
SCCRC MOJ SELL BY DATE



Joined: 09 Mar 2015
Posts: 19



PostPosted: Mon Aug 24, 2015 7:00 pm    Post subject: ALARMING Reply with quote

nugnug wrote:
they seem to be a bit confused about what they are mind you there not the only ones.


It is very alarming for all MOJ applicants that in a case whereby they are being sued for negligence for £700k they don't even know they are a public authority - my money is on they know full well but are trying to dodge liability!!! Time for Sheriff Sinclair to be removed from SCCRC CEO conflict of interest post!!!

Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    shirleymckie.myfastforum.org Forum Index -> Test Forum 1 All times are GMT
Page 1 of 1

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum

Card File  Gallery  Forum Archive
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
Create your own free forum | Buy a domain to use with your forum
Sincere thanks to all those who have supported Shirley and challenged miscarriages of justice on this forum.