shirleymckie.myfastforum.org Forum Index shirleymckie.myfastforum.org
To allow readers to post comments on current issues related to the Shirley McKie case
 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   Join! (free) Join! (free)
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 


WE KNOW WHO KILLED INGE LOTZ

 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    shirleymckie.myfastforum.org Forum Index -> Test Forum 1
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
Pat A. Wertheim



Joined: 23 Apr 2007
Posts: 35
Location: USA

PostPosted: Tue Dec 11, 2007 3:46 pm    Post subject: WE KNOW WHO KILLED INGE LOTZ Reply with quote

The Cape Argus
We know who killed Inge Lotz: private eyes
11 December 2007, 12:40

This Article:     http://www.capeargus.co.za/?fSect...icleId=vn20071211112451298C812829


Two private detectives claim they know who killed Stellenbosch student Inge Lotz and why, and have laid charges of intimidation and obstruction of justice against two police officers who they claim knew the details and did nothing about it.

Daryl Els and Christian Botha, private detectives appointed by the family of Lotz's boyfriend, Fred van der Vyver, said a witness to the murder had made a second statement to them recently in the presence of his lawyer.

The alleged witness is currently in jail on drug and murder charges.

On Tuesday Botha said that he and Els had laid charges at the Stellenbosch police station on Monday.

He said they had known about the witness and what he had said before Van der Vyver's murder trial had begun and that policemen who also knew about it at the time had done nothing to investigate further.

Lotz was brutally murdered in her Stellenbosch flat on March 16, 2005.

Last month, Van der Vyver was found not guilty of her murder in the Cape High Court by Judge Deon van Zyl and two assessors, who slammed the police investigation into the case.

Last week, private detective Niel van Heerden, of the firm George Fivaz and Associates, also laid charges of obstruction of justice and perjury against top investigators involved in the case.

Els and Botha, as well as Van Heerden, have accused members of the police team of lying under oath and of withholding information pertinent to the case from the court.

Els told the Cape Argus on Tuesday that according to the witness three killers had entered Lotz's apartment on the day of her death. One person was an acquaintance of hers.

"According to the witness … there were six people in total, but three entered the flat," he said.

"We have reason to believe their motive was to get money for drugs. All six are known to us and most of them are in jail at the moment waiting to appear on similar charges of murder, robbery and drug dealing."

Els and Botha also claim that the witness had been visited in jail by two police officers shortly after Van der Vyver was charged and told to "change his story" or face the consequences.

That was after he had already made a statement to them in 2005 saying he was involved in the murder.

Els said the reason why nothing was found to have been stolen from Lotz's flat at the time of the murder was that something had gone wrong and that the killers had fled before they could take anything.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
Big Wullie



Joined: 25 Apr 2007
Posts: 456
Location: Glasgow

PostPosted: Thu Dec 13, 2007 5:32 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Absolutely Shocking

Lets hope these police are not only charged with Perjury but they recieve a very heavy sentence as a deterrent to other liars and set up merchants.
I have no doubt though that they will be well in with the bricks so to speak and be let off scot free, Maybe even a wee promotion thrown in for good measure.

I also know the two people who committed the robbery for which i was convicted:
  http://shirleymckie.com/documents/CaseBeck.pdf

http://williambeck.wordpress.com/.../likely-judicial-review-of-sccrc/

When told their names the Scottish Criminal Cases Review Commisssion (SCCRC) must have got a big fright as they had referred the case of Ronnie Neeson to appeal court on the say so of one of the guilty ones i had named.

They told me it would be unlikely they would admit to it now and never investigated, yet they saw fit to refer Neesons Case and even though the person i had named had a long list of previous for robberies SCCRC put him forward as a credible and reliable witness in the case of neeson.

Alex Hardie, Now Dead, was used as a witness by SCCRC (Neeson V HMA below) but they refused to even interview him in my case.

I have a crown witness statement giving an exact description of Hardie's co-Accused, About forty year old with brown hair and moustache and SCCRC still refused to investigate.
Was the reason for this, It would spoil their credibility having already put the Neeson case forward to appeal on Hardies evidence.

Who knows, Maybe Hardie has left a note somewhere or told someone who might come forward now.

His last known address was 18 Windsor St, Glasgow which can be found here at Number 8. of Neesons Appeal

http://www.scotcourts.gov.uk/opinions/2006hcjac68.html

Edited to allow viewers to know what SCCRC stands for, As per request from Admin.

Sorry

Wullie
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    shirleymckie.myfastforum.org Forum Index -> Test Forum 1 All times are GMT
Page 1 of 1

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum

Card File  Gallery  Forum Archive
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
Create your own free forum | Buy a domain to use with your forum
Thanks to everyone who has supported Shirley over the years.Credit Cards|Mortgage