| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
kevin donald
Joined: 29 Oct 2007 Posts: 198
|
Posted: Sat Feb 07, 2009 3:16 pm Post subject: "The growing number of retrials, in Scotland" |
|
|
There is a high number of cases in Scotland where the crown want retrials.
Brian McConnachie, has asked for 2 already this year with Fergusson being the latest.
Below is one they are thinking about.
JB, was a prisoner in Dumfries and a college lecturer before conviction.
http://www.scotcourts.gov.uk/opinions/2009HCJAC13.html
JB Still maintains his innocence and wants a retrial, he has been remanded in Barlinnie while they decide if there will be one.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Angeline
Joined: 02 Oct 2008 Posts: 148
|
Posted: Sun Feb 08, 2009 12:18 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Can anyone help me out here (gap in understanding!!) I thought that re-trials in Scotland were much harder to justify/permit because we have the Not Proven verdict.
I'm not saying I agree with that, just that it was my understanding of the difference between Scots Law and, say English or American Law?
I'll be perfectly honest, I did read something about this, but I can't remember where or what!
Any enlightenment would be gratefully appreciated.  _________________ As long as one heart still holds on, then hope will never really be gone |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
kevin donald
Joined: 29 Oct 2007 Posts: 198
|
Posted: Sun Feb 08, 2009 12:42 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I thought that as well but in the last few years the crown have been pushed more in the appeal courts regarding misdirection.
Below is another one that looks like going to retrial.
http://www.scotcourts.gov.uk/opinions/2009HCJAC9.html
http://www.newsoftheworld.co.uk/s...dges-blunder-may-free-killer.html
Fat too many cases nowadays rely on circumstantial evidence for conviction hence the rise in appeals in Scotland.
Judges are now having to do the prosecutions work for them in trials.
Scotland needs to fall in line regarding not proven when new evidence comes into play. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Big Wullie
Joined: 25 Apr 2007 Posts: 1149
Location: Glasgow
|
Posted: Mon Feb 09, 2009 11:15 am Post subject: |
|
|
Angeline
Like the other case the other day if people like "our friend" had their say they would all be re-tried for Murder.
I think this is what will happen here in the above case.
If found Innocent in Scotland you cannot be "Re-Tried" no "Double Jeopardy" unlike England but I believe this will also be another issue that new Legislation will address this year.
Though Double Jeopardy doesn't exist Crown can ask for permission to bring another presecution, They need only ask and it will be granted as far as I know.
To my knowledge this has never been refused and he has a great Advocte defending him so wait and see |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
kevin donald
Joined: 29 Oct 2007 Posts: 198
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
kevin donald
Joined: 29 Oct 2007 Posts: 198
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
kevin donald
Joined: 29 Oct 2007 Posts: 198
|
Posted: Wed May 13, 2009 2:02 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Maguire, conviction quashed.
http://www.scotcourts.gov.uk/opinions/2009HCJAC48.html
[8] It only remains for us to record our surprise that this critical point was only raised on the morning of the appeal, and by the Crown, some 8 years after the original conviction. It was not raised in the original appeal, nor is it referred to in the present reference or in the original grounds of appeal before us, despite lengthy consideration and preparation over a period of years.
[9] In the circumstances, we have not heard any submissions in support of the original grounds of appeal. In quashing this conviction therefore we wish to make it particularly clear that we regard Maguire v HM Advocate as still representing the law of Scotland in this area and that without the intervention of the Crown in this responsible manner, there remains the distinct possibility that this conviction would have stood.
"This must be a first for the crown.
But they must be congratulated for it."
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|