shirleymckie.myfastforum.org Forum Index shirleymckie.myfastforum.org
To allow readers to post comments on current issues related to the Shirley McKie case
 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   Join! (free) Join! (free)
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

Previous convictions

 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    shirleymckie.myfastforum.org Forum Index -> Test Forum 1
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
Iain McKie



Joined: 08 May 2007
Posts: 635


Location: Ayr, Scotland.

PostPosted: Mon Jun 04, 2012 9:21 am    Post subject: Previous convictions Reply with quote

I am surprised that no-one has commented on the recent Law Commission recommendation that prosecutors should be able to use previous convictions as evidence in criminal trials.

Quote:
“Previous recommendations on Crown Appeals and Double Jeopardy have now been enacted in law and prosecutors are currently reviewing cases which can be prosecuted anew under the Double Jeopardy Act as a consequence.”  
http://www.scotland.gov.uk/News/R...12/05/previousconvictions23052012

Taken together with the double jeopardy legislation and issues like corroboration we are experiencing a campaigning government that is arguably defining justice as securing convictions at the expense of protecting the innocent. It could also be argued that the hand of the Crown Office can be seen at every turn.

Scotland’s record of miscarriages is not a proud one and it is unlikely that such recommendations unless carefully assessed will improve the situation.

This piecemeal reform is quite frankly dangerous and can quickly undermine the checks and balances required to ensure stability and equity in our justice system.

At a time when we are moving to a national police force we need to be extremely careful about ensuring that acountability and equality before the law are more than establishment platitudes.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Big Wullie



Joined: 25 Apr 2007
Posts: 4037


Location: Glasgow

PostPosted: Mon Jun 04, 2012 1:03 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

everything seems geared at convictions at all costs from the Courts to the COPFS.

What is more worrying is Kenny MacAskill seems happy just to put his signature to all these proposals without any checks or sefeguards being proposed or put forward.

It certainly seems a one horse race.
_________________
http://justiceforwulliebeck.webs.com/

Dum spiro spero.
Militamus sub spe.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Big Wullie



Joined: 25 Apr 2007
Posts: 4037


Location: Glasgow

PostPosted: Mon Jun 04, 2012 1:06 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I once stupidly thought the courts were independent of Crown but having watched the nat Fraser trial and the hassle I got for wanting to take notes leaves me in no doubt they work hand in hand.



_________________
http://justiceforwulliebeck.webs.com/

Dum spiro spero.
Militamus sub spe.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    shirleymckie.myfastforum.org Forum Index -> Test Forum 1 All times are GMT
Page 1 of 1

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum

Card File  Gallery  Forum Archive
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
Create your own free forum | Buy a domain to use with your forum
Sincere thanks to all those who have supported Shirley and challenged miscarriages of justice on this forum.