shirleymckie.myfastforum.org Forum Index shirleymckie.myfastforum.org
To allow readers to post comments on current issues related to the Shirley McKie case
 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   Join! (free) Join! (free)
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

The free forums are now under new ownership, a full announcement will be made shortly
Are SCCRC Independent Enough To Investigate Miscarriages
Page 1, 2  Next
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    shirleymckie.myfastforum.org Forum Index -> Test Forum 1
View previous topic :: View next topic  

Are SCCRC Independent Enough
Yes
0%
 0%  [ 0 ]
No
100%
 100%  [ 5 ]
Total Votes : 5

Author Message
Big Wullie



Joined: 25 Apr 2007
Posts: 5125


Location: Glasgow

PostPosted: Tue Jun 26, 2007 3:05 am    Post subject: Are SCCRC Independent Enough To Investigate Miscarriages  Reply with quote

This posting was removed but is repeated below

Please find enclosed link to latest you-tube video

http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=DP-ACuK1w0I


Last edited by Big Wullie on Sat Jun 30, 2007 1:39 am; edited 1 time in total
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Big Wullie



Joined: 25 Apr 2007
Posts: 5125


Location: Glasgow

PostPosted: Tue Jun 26, 2007 3:12 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

SCCRC Not Independent At-All

After viewing the following Link i have concluded that when the SCCRC sit and discuss Polices with Justice Department, (Who are their sole sponsors) Crown Office, High court personnel and Strathclyde Police their claim to be independent ebbs away.
What is your opinions?

http://www.flickr.com/photo_zoom.gne?id=493032396&size=l
_________________
http://justiceforwulliebeck.webs.com/

Dum spiro spero.
Militamus sub spe.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
admin
Site Admin


Joined: 22 Apr 2007
Posts: 186



PostPosted: Tue Jun 26, 2007 2:12 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

NB. This posting has been transferred from the subject line ‘Price of Innocence’ as it is the moderator's view that it does not relate to that subject and takes away from the issues being explored.

SCCRC Liars and Cover-Up Merchants

Please find enclosed link to latest you-tube video

This video is conclusive proof that SCCRC tried to cover up what my grounds were, They assured me they had sent Solicitor (Shaw) a copy of his own ID Parade report but from the video you can hear Shaw say he never saw it.
I was not afforded the same Enquiry by SCCRC that Megrahi Has.
Quite the contrary It was because i was complaining about his QC that my case was covered up by SCCRC.
This video exposes them for what they are "Cover-Up Merchants"

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DP-ACuK1w0I

I firmly believe that my case was suppressed by SCCRC because like Shirley i have the Lockerbie link. Taylor QC they have tried to paint whiter than white.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
Big Wullie



Joined: 25 Apr 2007
Posts: 5125


Location: Glasgow

PostPosted: Tue Jun 26, 2007 2:44 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Admin
I apologise profusely for the repeated postings, In a moment of madness i thought it would be better viewed if posted on every subject in these forums.
Not meaning to demean nor subtract from the other issues in any way.
anyhow i am able to admit when i am wrong which is more than can be said for some of our judiciary.

Keep up the fight

Big Wullie


Last edited by Big Wullie on Sat Jun 30, 2007 1:45 am; edited 1 time in total
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
PeterCherbi



Joined: 23 May 2007
Posts: 167


Location: Edinburgh

PostPosted: Wed Jun 27, 2007 12:28 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Just taking a look at who is on the SCCRC is enough to make an angel cringe.

There has to be a whole new framework brought into being for Committees & review panels - taking away all this lawyer, ex policeman, ex judge, ex politican ex whatever entirely out of the recruitment equation.

There obviously has to be legal advisers to such panels - but make them just that, advisers - don't stuff the panel full of legal profession members & associates and these so called lay members who are popping up all over the place on regulatory & review committees allegedly protecting the public interest but only protecting, and promoting themselves ... because that causes as much injustice in itself as does the justice system.

To the Executive - we need a culture of justice in Scotland - not a continuing culture of injustice, and the SCCRC it seems from Big Wullie's case and a few others out there, is very much a representation of the injustice which has dragged the Scottish legal system into the dirt.
_________________
My blog on issues of injustice in Scotland A Diary of Injustice in Scotland by Peter Cherbi

Injustice Scotland Campaign website : Injustice Scotland
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Big Wullie



Joined: 25 Apr 2007
Posts: 5125


Location: Glasgow

PostPosted: Tue Aug 14, 2007 10:23 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Today's Sun, SCCRCs Gerard Sinclair Caught Flashing.

Please find links to my flickr where you will be able to read what Gerard Sinclair Got up to at Gleneagles.
Apparently he has a wee.... Habit of flashing his w.....
This is shocking behaviour and appalling from a father of two Daughters.
Most importantly he is the one who oversaw the investigations into the Lockerbie Appeal along with my own.
His actions now totally destroy any credibility he ever had and he should be asked to resign in disgrace.
Bye Mr Sinclair, Not sorry to see you go.

http://www.flickr.com/photo_zoom.gne?id=1119457278&size=l


http://www.flickr.com/photo_zoom.gne?id=1119704228&size=l

Isn't it funny how someone was just calling for him to resign at the following link.

http://thescotsman.scotsman.com/index.cfm?id=1270422007#new

God works in mysterious ways they say


Last edited by Big Wullie on Tue Aug 14, 2007 11:10 pm; edited 1 time in total
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
freethekillie2



Joined: 27 Apr 2007
Posts: 309



PostPosted: Tue Aug 14, 2007 10:30 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

great stuff wullie,
this man is not fit to hold office .

i would say bye bye to him ,, just goes to show eh?

and wullie the threats are not a problem the truth will out you know what i mean.

freethekiliie2.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Iain McKie



Joined: 08 May 2007
Posts: 936


Location: Ayr, Scotland.

PostPosted: Wed Aug 15, 2007 10:04 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

In reading the Sun’s headlines I was only too aware of the sad fact that yet another innocent family will suffer one way or another.

Although in recent years the highest in the land have seemed immune from the consequences of their lying and procrastination, responsibility and accountability should come with public office.

Although this event is alleged to have taken place in 2001, before Mr Sinclair's appointment to the SCCRC, how it is resolved will tell us a great deal about the workings of our justice system and to a lesser extent our media.

Among the important questions that must be answered are:

Is the story true?

Why is it only being revealed now?

If the allegations are true was anyone involved in his appointment as Chief Executive aware given that Scotland's great and good would be assembled for the event?

Can a retrospective complaint be made about this alleged behaviour?

Can you separate the arguably drunken behaviour of an individual 6 years ago from his subsequent decisions as Chief Executive?

I look forward to hearing the answers to these questions but believe, given their nature, if the allegations are true, the answer to the last question must be “no”.

We shall see.

Another final question for each and every one of us.

If we find Mr. Sinclair guilty before he has an opportunity to answer the charges are we being hypocritical and adopting exactly the same authority attitude that has condemned so many to years of fighting for justice?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Big Wullie



Joined: 25 Apr 2007
Posts: 5125


Location: Glasgow

PostPosted: Wed Aug 15, 2007 1:47 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Good Points Iain

Is the story true? Do you suggest that the camera is lying, Maybe someone superimposed his head onto this Kilt.
Of course it is true.
Why is it being released now?
God works in Mysterious ways i have said and i firmly believe that.
I also believe that someone else is also fed up with Sinclairs Lies and Cover Ups.
Lets face it Sinclair is the one in my case that..........
Took over three years to investigate my two day trial.
Only interviewed a handful of witnesses, Selective ones at that.
Never answered my Muldoon complaint.
Never answered when challenged over my defence team not calling Key Forensic Evidence available to them at the time of my trial.
He's the one who never answered my Anderson complaint (Defective Representation)
He's the one who never asked my defence team why..... They never interviewed 16 defence witnesses before my trial.
He's the one that told me my witnesses evidence was Hearsay.... Without interviewing them.
He should be made to resign his post with "Immediate Effect"
Not only is he incapable of doing the job entrusted to him, But now his is guilty of bringing his profession into Disrepute, Surely he will be investigated if one looks at what Donald Findlay was investigated over.
I did complain to Justice Minister about his incompetence and negligence and even complained about his professional misconduct in their lack of investigation into my case.
Now we all have cause to complain of his conduct it would seem.


William Beck
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Big Wullie



Joined: 25 Apr 2007
Posts: 5125


Location: Glasgow

PostPosted: Tue Oct 02, 2007 11:36 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Suggestion For SNP Government

Can i suggest that since Mr MacAskill has conceded that there is an Adversarial System within the Law Society, That the very same system is now operating within the ranks of SCCRC.
Why in this day and age are we still asking people to find fault with their own.
SCCRC are far from independent of our Judicial System when their members read like this:
Ex Judges
Ex Police
Ex lawyers
Ex Prosecutors
What exactly are they independent of?
Their Chief Executive Sits as a part time Judge and also sits on the Law Society Criminal Law Committee, No chance of any complaints against him Succeeding then eh?
In actual fact there is no-one to whom you can complain about the conduct of any of their Members.
Public Services Ombudsman i hear you say? No chance wouldn't look at complaints of Misconduct or Malpractice.
Standards Commissioner then? No Chance, Same answer from them as Ombudsman....... Cant look at complaints of this nature.

Conclusion

So not only do we have a body that Is Not Independent
We have a body you simply cannot complain about.

We want an Independent Body with Accountability and Openness

Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    shirleymckie.myfastforum.org Forum Index -> Test Forum 1 All times are GMT
Page 1, 2  Next
Page 1 of 2

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum

Card File  Gallery  Forum Archive
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
Create your own free forum | Buy a domain to use with your forum
Sincere thanks to all those who have supported Shirley and challenged miscarriages of justice on this forum.