Big Wullie
|
Fiscal Is A FraudDeleted
|
Fiscal
|
Deleted
|
Fiscal
|
Deleted
|
Big Wullie
|
Deleted
|
Fiscal
|
Deleted
|
Fiscal
|
Deleted
|
Fiscal
|
Deleted
|
Big Wullie
|
Deleted
|
Fiscal
|
Deleted
|
Big Wullie
|
Deleted
|
Fiscal
|
Deleted
|
Big Wullie
|
Deleted
|
Fiscal
|
Deleted
|
Big Wullie
|
MODERATOR: Inappropriate link removed.
|
Fiscal
|
Deleted
|
Lydia
|
Fiscal, may I ask if you were not speaking as a fiscal why would you sign yourself Fiscal and advertise a legal background.
That does not make sense
You sound a little like a person found on another Scottish site called infreiquentAlli. This person joined another Scottish site and was very soon blocked. The reason he was blocked was simply that the reason he joined was to abuse and insult genuine people discussing many different news items and subjects, which, were normally, discussed passionately but fairly.
I think there are a few people who join sites like ours to insult because they have a poor view of their own ability to converse normally and have no idea of the unwritten rules of debate.
I have never heard any well-educated person who needed to resort to abuse and insult to get their point over. I suppose it is a bit like swearing that shows a lack of vocabulary.
|
scotkaz
|
Lydia I sent you a private message
|
Fiscal
|
Deleted
|
Big Wullie
|
Deleted
|
admin
|
MODERATOR: Forum discipline and debate is being harmed by these sterile identity arguments. Please confine debate to justice issues and not personal attacks.
|
Fiscal
|
Deleted
|
Nought Justice
|
| Quote: | | (i/e finished my traineeship as a solicitor, then completed the 9 months devilling |
Since when did a solicitor need to be devilled for 9 months ?
Just an observation
|
Fiscal
|
Deleted
|
Big Wullie
|
I actually disagree with the following:
| Quote: | | This debate has nothing to do with justice and is pointless. |
It has plenty to do with justice when you are passing yourself off as an officer of the court when you are clearly not.
You are using a logo of the Faculty of Advocates while by your own admission you are only a Solicitor, No officer of the court would do this.
You are right though about the Devilling this only happens to Advocates so if you are only a Solicitor you would not have passed any devilling then.
You are actually taking the debates away from people who come to this forum with reasoned debates with your pretending to be someone you are not.
What really takes the biscuit though is the fact you are actually giving vulnerable people like Kevin what he thinks is Proper Legal Advice
|
Fiscal
|
you say "Clearly" not...what evidence other than your own speculation do you have in support of this.]?
Secondly if you care to read the comments I posted I told you i WAS a solicitor and I am NOW an Advocate so therefore have completed not "passed" the devilling process.
I'm getting tired of this...this unfounded argument has nothing to do with justice (unless you can prove such accusations)
I could equally say you are guilty of the offences you have been found guilty of...but like you, I have no evidence in support of this. Secondly unlike you I have nothing to prove. When I walk into court on Monday after a nice holiday I can put my gown on safe in the knowledge that I have the right to do so irrespective of what some bitter convict has to say about it. Anything I say I could argue until I am blue in the face but you won't agree so say no more and stop having the last word...have some humility.
|
Fiscal
|
Kevin,
I am happy to give you legal advice.....and I would even go as far as to say anything I have said/will say to you - run it past your own legal representative.....ask them if it's correct.
|
kevin donald
|
Wullie how do you know i asked Fiscal for legal advice?
Fiscal i did check the advice you gave me and it is true what you said.
Brendan's legal team are trying for a re-trial but the crown are twiddling their fingers about it.
I dare say if a new trial is brought with all the evidence this time heard it will be a different verdict.
Thanks Fiscal.
|
Big Wullie
|
Question and Answer Time
Kevin
| Quote: | | Wullie how do you know i asked Fiscal for legal advice? |
Answer:
Kevin : | Quote: | | Fiscal i did check the advice you gave me and it is true what you said. |
Is that proof and clear enough for the readers.
Kevin sometimes you forget what you have told people you have a very bad memory.
Despite what you may think I still wish Brendan all the best of luck at his appeal.
Genuine appeals and people with genuine causes will always get my support
|
Big Wullie
|
Kevin
Are you saying you have never asked Fiscal for advice ?
|
kevin donald
|
Yes i asked for advice but that was through private pm, and not on the forum board.
Thanks anyway for saying that about Brendan.
|
Fiscal
|
You're welcome Kevin.
I replied to your private message.
NB Users
Private Messages are simply in their nature as the name suggests - Private! And for clarity unauthorised use of usernames and passwords (previously divulged or not) is a breach of the Computer Misuse Act and the Communications Act.
|
admin
|
MODERATOR: This thread is being closed down as irrelevant to the subject of justice. Further postings will be deleted.
|
|
|
