 |
shirleymckie.myfastforum.org To allow readers to post comments on current issues related to the Shirley McKie case
|
| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
Angeline
Joined: 02 Oct 2008 Posts: 148
|
Posted: Wed May 13, 2009 8:48 am Post subject: |
|
|
It's now so clear a to be almost transparent to even the simplest mind that a mountain of evidence exists showing this to be a miscarriage of justice, yet we're supposed to accept that the finest legal minds in the country need up to 2 years to conclude what the rest of us can already see plainly?
Grant the man interim bail - he has family here, and would be able to endure his illness with some dignity whilst the dinosaur that is our legal system lumbers its way through the appeal.
This case is making a complete and total mockery of Scottish Justice, and the more they drag their heels, stall, use every legal and tactical trick in the book to evade the issue, the worse that mockery appears.
_________________ As long as one heart still holds on, then hope will never really be gone |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
scotkaz

Joined: 28 Aug 2008 Posts: 527
|
Posted: Fri May 15, 2009 7:29 am Post subject: |
|
|
Al-Megrahi has alternative to non-choice over appeal
Published Date: 14 May 2009
If it really is true that Abdel Baset Al-Megrahi is not guilty, it must be very difficult for him to agree to take advantage of the Prisoner Transfer Agreement (your report, 7 May).
Why would he trust a deal under which he would have to renounce his appeal in the hope that ministers of the state, which he would see as having wrongly convicted him, would later agree to his transfer?
He has an alternative. When he applied previously for bail on compassionate grounds because of his illness, this was rejected but he was told that his lawyers could apply again if his circumstances changed.
On 8 May, we heard in court that he was in too much discomfort from his illness, and in too great a need for further treatment urgently this week, to be able even to listen to the court proceedings over the line arranged for him between the court and Greenock prison.
This surely is a grave change of circumstances.
If he applied again, maybe bail would be approved, he has little to lose by doing so, the decision by their lordships could be quickly reached, and if positive, the bail conditions would require him to remain in Scotland, but he could be with his family at the house which is already available for them.
Separation from his family is known to be a great stress for him. Reducing his stress level would be likely to prolong his life. Guilty or innocent, it also seems the humane, Christian and merciful thing to do.
Were he to die in prison during the appeal, he will surely be seen as a martyr, Scots law would take further criticism, and there would be at least further delay in examining the totality of the evidence now available.
Those who, like us, seek the truth in this terrible case should be greatly relieved were bail granted, since he would not be required to withdraw his appeal, and we are desperately keen to see all the evidence examined again in the appeal court under Scots law as soon as possible.
There also appears to be no obvious alternative to the appeal for the Scottish legal system to redress the grave damage which its reputation has sustained, particularly abroad, through the verdict reached on the basis of the evidence at Zeist.
(DR) JIM SWIRE
Chipping Campden
Gloucestershire
_________________ Great Spirit, grant that I may not criticize my neighbor until I have walked a mile in his moccasins." - Old Native American Indian Prayer that my dad taught me. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
|