shirleymckie.myfastforum.org

Al · Posted: Sun Jun 24, 2007 8:13 am Post subject:

Scottish "Justice" System in the dock again over the "framing" of the Lockerbie bomber

Scottish Police and Crown Prosecution Service implicated in that framing of the Libyan, Abdelbaset Ali Mohmed al-Megrahi

The eyes of the world are now upon us, and the message appears to be clear for the world to see:

Don't go to Scotland if you are searching for "justice" ... you'll very seldom find it there ... or will be prevented from finding it there by the "corrupt" Scottish authorities.

Over to you Messrs Salmond and MacAskill ... it's now up to you both and the Scottish National Party to clean up the "corruption" and constant "perversion of justice" that is endemic throughout the Scottish "Justice" System ... and has been for several years.

__________

Lockerbie News Update
http://news.google.co.uk/news?hl=...Megrahi+Lockerbie&btnG=Search

The Lockerbie Connection
http://www.google.com/search?sour...Aen&q=Shirley+McKie+Lockerbie

The question we have to ask about Lockerbie case - Dr Jim Swire
http://www.theherald.co.uk/misc/print.php?artid=1480549

Peter Cherbi
http://petercherbi.blogspot.com/2...aw-back-in-dock-as-lockerbie.html

Big Wullie · Joined: 25 Apr 2007 Posts: 550 Location: Glasgow

Re, Lockerbie Decision By SCCRC

As i have said for a long time SCCRC took three years to investigate my case which only lasted two days at trial.
They only interviewed a handful of witnesses and refused point blank to hear new witness evidence.
They refused to answer me when i claimed my defence team were negligent for the following Reasons:
1. They never interviewed 16 defence witnesses Before during or since my trial.
2. They never called Crucial Crown Evidence saying the driver was forty years old with brown hair and moustache. When i was only twenty with black hair.
3. They never called crucial key Forensic Evidence.
4. They never answered me in my Muldoon Argument in regards to Ashfords evidence.
5. They agreed the judge misdirected my Jury and still refused to refer my case.
6. They agreed what happened at my ID Parade was not acceptable by today's standards. But still refused to apply their Current Law Policy and refused still to refer my appeal.
7.They refused to interview my brother who told Keegan (Solicitor) he had brought one of the hammers to my house only the night before i was arrested, My defence team failed to see the significance of this evidence and did not call it at trial.
8. They assured me they had sent Shaw a copy of his own ID Parade report which said the police had identified me without turning to view Parade. Shaw has said he never seen it and only after i produced a copy of the tape did they send this to Shaw. Which was after they had concluded my appeal and decided not to refer.
Mr Shaw has now told SCCRC that his big Impression was that the policeman knew prior to coming into the parade room exactly which position i had adopted.
Still the SCCRC refuse to refer my case.
What more do they need?
Cases like Kidd And Gair referred on only one statement being withheld by Crown and even in the Gair case it was agreed there was still sufficient evidence from two police to allow the conviction to stand The appeal was allowed. Shocking.
SCCRC had argued that there was a discrepency given in the height by the two police.
Yet in my case the evidence withheld states the driver was forty when i was only twenty and i had black hair and never had Moustache either. SCCRC do not agree this was an arguable point.
I firmly believe it's not what you know, it's who you know in SCCRC and it depends on who you are complaining of.
I also firmly believed when i put my application into SCCRC that they were never going to allow my appeal as it Discredits the Competence of Taylor who went on to Get Megrahi Found Guilty too.
Taylor i feel SCCRC wanted to remain Whiter than white.
I had no chance when Taylor still sat on the Board of SCCRC whilst my case was investigated yet resigned to allow them to remain Independent and Impartial in Investigating Megrahi's appeal.
There are supporting documents for all my claims on the following flickr site which i will link.
In all that i have said above makes me fear for Megrahi. His life is in the hands of Incompetent and negligent Imbeciles who can do and say what they want without redress.
There is absollutely no one to whom you can complain about their conduct.
I see on their web site that this Megrahi Decision is at the moment over 800 pages, my god there is usually only about four when referring a case.

http://www.sccrc.org.uk/viewfile.aspx?id=289

http://www.flickr.com/photos/big-wullie/

Al · Posted: Sun Jun 24, 2007 8:46 pm Post subject:

Swire urges Salmond to order full inquiry [as do all the regular posters on this forum]
http://scotlandonsunday.scotsman.com/scotland.cfm?id=986832007

Scotland on Sunday Front Page - "NOT GUILTY" ...... So, just WHO is?
http://scotlandonsunday.scotsman.com/frontpage.cfm

Lockerbie (Scotsman publications)
http://news.scotsman.com/topics.cfm?tid=184

Lockerbie News Update
http://news.google.co.uk/news?hl=...t+Ali+Mohmed+al-Megrahi+Lockerbie

Big Wullie · Joined: 25 Apr 2007 Posts: 550 Location: Glasgow

NB. This posting has been removed as it is the moderator's view that it does not relate to this subject and a similar posting has already been made under 'Are SCCRC independent enough.....'

Please find enclosed link to latest you-tube video

Big Wullie · Joined: 25 Apr 2007 Posts: 550 Location: Glasgow

Taken from a google search under SCCRC i found the following .

Latest News...
June 26th 2007
SCCRC to recommend second appeal?
Was the investigation 'reverse engineered' by US and British intelligence services?
The Scottish SCCRC will announce their findings on Thursday 28th June 2007. Immediately after that announcement, the British relatives group [UK Families Flight103] will hold a press conference in Edinburgh's Holyrood Parliament [13.00 hrs].
An understanding is finally growing among the British media and public that the greatest scandal in modern British legal history has occurred. After nineteen years of campaigning to discover who murdered the passengers of Pan Am 103, Jim Swire feels that at last the truth is close to exposure.
Apparent leaks to the media of sections of the defence team submission presented to the SCCRC and of the Commission's own findings indicate yet more doubts about the prosecution case against Al-Megrahi. We are confident that a new appeal must take account of proven past activities of Dr Thomas Hayes which led to the false imprisonment of the Maguire family. Hopefully Hayes, if called, will be compelled to give further evidence about the tiny fragment of the Lockerbie bomb which he claimed to have discovered in 1989. This was the only piece of hard evidence repeatedly said by American intelligence services to link Libya to the bombing.
The ambiguity of statements made by Maltese shopkeeper Tony Gauci and the role of Scottish police in coaxing out of him answers supporting the prosecution case will hopefully be examined in the light of the unease publicly expressed by former Scottish Lord Advocate Peter Fraser. Fraser collated and presented the prosecution evidence supporting the November 1991 indictment of Al-Megrahi. His views about the known unreliability of Gauci's testimony at the time of the indictment are noted elsewhere on this site.
Iranian multi-million dollar payments to the PFLP-GC and Abu Talb immediately after the bombing are now proven. No similar payments were made at any time prior to the year of the bombing, or since. That indicates strongly that the payments related to the Lockerbie bombing and to no other terrorist attack.

freethekillie2 · Joined: 27 Apr 2007 Posts: 309

http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=va&aid=4615

the above site just goes to show how dirty our country is with regards to black ops. did they do the same to mr magrahi, or was it the push of american interest.

freethekillie2 · Joined: 27 Apr 2007 Posts: 309

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alte...g_of_Pan_Am_Flight_103#South-West

this is also very informing about lockerbie, worth a look .

Iain McKie · Joined: 08 May 2007 Posts: 192 Location: Ayr, Scotland.

A major media conference is being held in the Scottish Parliament tomorrow at 1 pm to allow reaction to the SCCRC report into Mr Megrahi's conviction.

I will be attending.

The Scottish justice system that has failed so many is very much on the agenda.

Al · Posted: Wed Jun 27, 2007 11:30 pm Post subject:

Will be watching and listening to the BBC Scotland TV and Radio reports with great interest, Iain.

The cynic in me says that Broon's Cabinet re-shuffle could very well overshadow the SCCRC announcement and subsequent media conference, and that this "coincidental" timing of events was planned long ago as ... "a very good day to bury bad news".

Big Wullie · Joined: 25 Apr 2007 Posts: 550 Location: Glasgow

Iain

Good luck at the press conference, Having spoken to you yesterday i know you have all our interests at heart and will represent Injustice as much as you can.
Best of luck.
Al
Like yourself i am optimistic and yes the timing of Blair's resignation will have been perfectly timed.
I have no doubt that SCCRC will not find any fault in our Judicial System nor with any of the evidence upon which they relied for conviction.
I have different reasons for this than most though, Please all take time to listen to the video i put on you tube yesterday to coincide with SCCRCs decision.
The video is blank screen and only sound.

http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=DP-ACuK1w0I