shirleymckie.myfastforum.org

Big Wullie · Joined: 25 Apr 2007 Posts: 486 Location: Glasgow

Iain

It would seem that while you are still a policeman your evidence will be Very Credible and Reliable but..............Once you become an ex policeman this seems to disappear.
If this person had come forward at the time there is no doubt in my mind his career would have been in bits and they would have tried every trick in the book as they did with Shirley to discredit him.
"This would and could have meant sacked with no pension"
The latter is i feel the biggest threat any policeman will face and would strike fear into any career minded person never mind a Policeman.
I believe the same is being said in the Nat Fraser case.

Big Wullie · Joined: 25 Apr 2007 Posts: 486 Location: Glasgow

Teletext News Yesterday Friday 31st August

It would seem that the transfer of Megrahi to Libya is Imminent.
It has been suggested that since his Family have now packed up their belongings in Scotland and flew back to Libya this indicates his transfer is Imminent.
True or not we will have to wait and see.
I have searched every Scottish Paper i can find and none have the story, Very Surprising since the Scotsman done a great number before he was granted his Appeal
World news this should be yet it has Just a mere mention on Teletext

freethekillie2 · Joined: 27 Apr 2007 Posts: 309

yesterdays scottish daily mail, also in today's.

Speculation is mounting that the Lockerbie bomber could be on his way back to Libya after his family moved out of their home in Scotland.

It is suspected they could be preparing to leave the country ahead of Abdelbaset Ali Mohmed Al Megrahi's return to his homeland.

Tony Blair struck a deal in Tripoli in May this year which could lead to the former intelligence agent being returned there.

Megrahi may soon be transferred back to Libya

Megrahi's wife and children, who live in a house in Newton Mearns on the outskirts of Glasgow, had their belongings loaded into a shipping container yesterday.

Dr Jim Swire, whose daughter, Flora, died in the bombing, said: "If she is going home, a 'done deal' - where Megrahi's repatriation has already been decided - could certainly be a possible interpretation."

Al Megrahi was convicted in 2001 of the Lockerbie bombing - 13 years after it happened.

All 259 people on board Pan Am flight 103 died when the aircraft exploded above the quiet Scottish town on December 21, 1988.

The wreckage which plunged to the ground also killed 11 Lockerbie residents.

But Al Megrahi was recently given a fresh chance to clear his name when the Scottish Criminal Cases Review Commission ruled in June that he can take his case to appeal judges for a second time.

The deal struck by Mr Blair, which could lead to Al Megrahi's transfer, triggered the first major row between the Government and the SNP administration in Scotland.

First Minister Alex Salmond said the deal covered "law, extradition and prisoner transfer" - so could involve Al Megrahi.

But he said neither the Scottish Parliament nor the Scottish Executive was consulted beforehand.

It was claimed this ran counter to procedures which govern communications between Westminster and devolved administrations, which require the Government to involve the administrations as fully as possible.

WHAT A COVER UP IF TRUE!

Big Wullie · Joined: 25 Apr 2007 Posts: 486 Location: Glasgow

Just a quick response to say briefly.
I think it a disgrace none of our big Scottish Newspapers carried the Megrahi family removing all their belongings.
Although in the Mail it would seem none of the others like Scotsman, Herald, Times, Sun or Record thought it worthy news, Very strange.
Muslim news even carried the story and can be found at the following link:
http://www.indianmuslims.info/new..._family_leaves_scotland_home.html
It can also be found on Berwichshire news at:

http://www.berwickshire-news.co.u...mbers-family-quit-home.3164124.jp

Are our main Scottish Media now afraid to carry any news relating to Megrahi being Transferred?
What a shocking Indictment on our Media

freethekillie2 · Joined: 27 Apr 2007 Posts: 309

todays herald on lockerbie.

http://www.theherald.co.uk/news/news/display.var.1664337.0.0.php

Iain McKie · Joined: 08 May 2007 Posts: 173 Location: Ayr, Scotland.

Gulf News: 'Was Libya framed for Lockerbie bombing?

http://archive.gulfnews.com/articles/07/09/04/10151176.html

Big Wullie · Joined: 25 Apr 2007 Posts: 486 Location: Glasgow

SCCRC

It is well documented that there was evidence in front of SCCRC which Exculpates Megrahi, What did they do with this evidence?
It will be interesting to hear at his appeal exactly what investigations SCCRC undertook and what was rejected.
The consistency they are showing is Appalling, Some police they refer to as credible and reliable but when Ex High Ranking Police now come forward they are not Credible, Exactly who decides on this credibility within SCCRC.
Could it possibly be the one who likes to expose himself as highlighted in the sun newspaper recently or is it the lower ranking Legal Officers who decide what evidence is credible or not.
It is appalling that in their referral of the Ronald Neeson case, They found ex Convicts evidence credible and reliable enough to refer his case, For those who haven't read the Neeson case it can be found here:
http://www.scotcourts.gov.uk/opinions/HCJAC68.html
I know for sure Alex Hardie had a long list of convictions and he was one of the people (I told SCCRC) That committed the robbery i was wrongly convicted of. The only reason i am now naming him here is the fact that He Is Now Dead.
SCCRC chose to ignore my claim even though they had already interviewed him in regards to Neesons case, I was simply told that: It would be unlikely that he would admit his guilt now.
This surely must call into question Exactly who decides Credibility and Reliability within SCCRC

Although SCCRC have said neither would admit their guilt to me this is wrong, I never said i asked them if they were guilty. This Is their Senior Legal Officers Interpretation of what i said.
http://www.flickr.com/photo_zoom.gne?id=695912443&size=l

Iain McKie · Joined: 08 May 2007 Posts: 173 Location: Ayr, Scotland.

The shame of Lockerbie.

http://www.shirleymckie.com/documents/Lockerbie7.9.07.pdf

Big Wullie · Joined: 25 Apr 2007 Posts: 486 Location: Glasgow

Shame is Being Polite is it not.

It's not a word i would use in this case, God Damn Disgraceful is more suited.
Of course with the SCCRC Flasher deciding whose evidence is credible and Reliable any affidavit's now produced will be cast aside and the reason we all know will be: "But why come forward now" Maybe an Attack of Guilt, Maybe just because at the time they were afraid, Maybe in the case of the high Ranking Policeman he was afraid of losing his pension, Who knows why these people change their statements?
The only thing SCCRC should be looking at is: If this evidence was before a Jury, Would it have raised a reasonable Doubt, In my book any change of statement certainly raises that Doubt and the accused in this Country is supposed to benefit from that doubt.
SCCRC along with the last Labour Government chose to cover up most of what went on behind the scenes with this case because it severely damages the Reputation of Scottish Justice beyond Repair.
Lets hope SNP do a better Job and be a Government our Country can be proud of again.
In order to repair the damage to the Judicial System, They must hold them Accountable for their actions.
No longer should SCRO and the likes be allowed to benefit from Immunity from Prosecution when they are found to be covering up Evidence.
Crown Office must also now release every detail to defence teams in preparartion for trials, Apparently they are still refusing to do so despite Privy Coucil and Human Rights laws saying they should.

Iain McKie · Joined: 08 May 2007 Posts: 173 Location: Ayr, Scotland.

For those wishing to better understand the background to the Lockerbie disaster I recommend you read a recent article by Professor Edward S Herman.

http://www.shirleymckie.com/Lockerbie-thefacts.htm