Forum Index
To allow readers to post comments on current issues related to the Shirley McKie case
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   Join! (free) Join! (free)
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

Dangers of Defamation

Post new topic   Reply to topic Forum Index -> Test Forum 1
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
Site Admin

Joined: 22 Apr 2007
Posts: 186

PostPosted: Fri May 07, 2010 2:00 pm    Post subject: Dangers of Defamation  Reply with quote

On the Luke Mitchell thread I was asked the following question.

Are we not permitted to use Condom Man's real name in this debate?

I tend to remove ‘real names’ from the debate although they will at times slip through.

Contributors need to realise that they are not immune from civil action should they defame any named person specifically.

It is to be hoped that contributors can back up their allegations and are not using the forum as a gratuitous way of getting at named individuals.

It is open to aggrieved parties to petition the court for me to reveal the source of individual contributions  if I have this information. Individual contributions have to be carefully researched and accurate.

Those suffering injustice have had to endure years of  wrongful accusation. It is hardly justice for any contributors to make such accusations against anyone who is not in a position to defend themselves.

The general advice I would give is to avoid direct accusations against any named individual.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail

Joined: 18 Feb 2011
Posts: 5

PostPosted: Sat Feb 19, 2011 2:26 pm    Post subject: The need for due diligence at all times Reply with quote

I could not agree more with the need for caution over making direct accusations towards various named individuals without due diligence being carried out first.

In the pursuit of truth and justice we can all become very frustrated, distressed and angry and these natural human emotions often cloud our judgement and rational thinking.

Mr McKie's approach and remarks are the right way forward and should be adhered to at all times.

Thank you for setting up this forum 4 years ago Mr McKie.  But there are two sadnesses to this as I now see it.  Firstly, it took your own dreadful experiences with the Scottish justice system to feel the great need for such a forum in the first place.  And, secondly, I do not think that any of the many miscarriages and injustices highlighted here over the past 4 years have yet been properly resolved.

A most sad and damning indictment of Scotland's justice system - and, I certainly feel, a very poor reflection on those who have governed over us from Holyrood and St Andrew's House over the past 4 years.

I wish you well.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message

Joined: 28 Jul 2017
Posts: 1

PostPosted: Fri Jul 28, 2017 5:11 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

For small businesses the defamation risk can be as simple as someone in your business criticising a competitor's product or service in a tweet.

essay help uk
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic Forum Index -> Test Forum 1 All times are GMT
Page 1 of 1

Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum

Card File  Gallery  Forum Archive
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
Create your own free forum | Buy a domain to use with your forum
Sincere thanks to all those who have supported Shirley and challenged miscarriages of justice on this forum.