shirleymckie.myfastforum.org Forum Index shirleymckie.myfastforum.org
To allow readers to post comments on current issues related to the Shirley McKie case
 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   Join! (free) Join! (free)
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 


Who Murdered Arlene Fraser, Was It Nat.
Goto page 1, 2, 3, 4  Next
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    shirleymckie.myfastforum.org Forum Index -> Test Forum 1
View previous topic :: View next topic  

Did Nat Murder Arlene
Yes
0%
 0%  [ 0 ]
Dont Know
70%
 70%  [ 7 ]
No
30%
 30%  [ 3 ]
Total Votes : 10

Author Message
Big Wullie



Joined: 25 Apr 2007
Posts: 471
Location: Glasgow

PostPosted: Thu Jun 07, 2007 1:49 am    Post subject: Who Murdered Arlene Fraser, Was It Nat. Reply with quote

After reading todays Scotsman this Nat Fraser Appeal is a must for these pages.
Crown are now trying to "Say" that the two police officers who have come forward have not to be believed.
I would like to know exactly what Crown will base this arguement on, Will they for example now say: After the amount of Lies from all these experts in the Shirley McKie Case We (Crown) Now Concede that "Police Tell Lies". Interesting?
Whether he did it or not is not my Problem nor yours but hey we are entitled to our opinions eh?
At the very least it can be demonstrated Fit Ups do occur.

http://thescotsman.scotsman.com/index.cfm?id=889492007



Last edited by Big Wullie on Wed Jun 20, 2007 12:23 am; edited 1 time in total
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
freethekillie2



Joined: 27 Apr 2007
Posts: 309

PostPosted: Thu Jun 07, 2007 6:09 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

wullie, this is shocking news. now the crown dont believe there own. the crown are a crime on there own and the best thing about it .it was strathclyde police that did the investigation. lol this opens up a huge can of worms, will the snp let the crown, do this or be like joke and cathy and hide .
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
PeterCherbi



Joined: 23 May 2007
Posts: 126
Location: Edinburgh

PostPosted: Thu Jun 07, 2007 1:45 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Thanks for pointing out that case, BigWullie ... amazing argument from the Crown Office there regarding the Police Officers testimony - who is to be believed now, the Crown Office or the evidence given by the officers ... and both at loggerheads with each other in public.

A fine advert for a complete reform of the Crown Office being a top priority for the new SNP administration - because no one else dare to it I think based on the evidence of previous administrations ...
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Big Wullie



Joined: 25 Apr 2007
Posts: 471
Location: Glasgow

PostPosted: Thu Jun 07, 2007 2:48 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

# Peter Cherbi and Freethekillie2.

Yes shocking case, and shows Crown Office for what it is. I bet at the trial Crown would have went berserk if anyone had suggested the police had lied?
Another Argument against crown here should be the old Lord Advocate Frasers use of Gauci in the Trial Of Megrahi ....MODERATED.
Again this shows the length Crown will go to to secure a conviction.
Below is a stark reminder of what he said, Judge for yourselves.
http://news.scotsman.com/topics.cfm?tid=184&id=2164502005
Then there is the case of the lying policeman from Livingston, Found Guilty of perjury and sentenced to a Meagre 73 Days, Its ok for them to be caught telling lies as they will get very light sentences.
http://edinburghnews.scotsman.com/index.cfm?id=332862007
I have just noticed that the Headline on the story above suggests Lying Police OFFICE. That would be right in my eyes as this lot are the ones that set me up, See comments.
These cases should now form part of Any Judicial Enquiry into the Conduct Of Crown Office.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
freethekillie2



Joined: 27 Apr 2007
Posts: 309

PostPosted: Thu Jun 07, 2007 7:06 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

YOU CRACK ME UP WULLIE, THIS IS JUST ONE OF MANY MISCARRAIGES IN SCOTLAND. MAYBE THE SNP WILL RETURN THE CURRANT AND PLACE IT IN THE BUN LOL.THERE IS JUSTICE NEEDED FOR A LOT OF FAMILIES, THIS IS ANOTHER ATTEMPT TO GET OUT OF ADMIT THERE WRONGDOINGS.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Big Wullie



Joined: 25 Apr 2007
Posts: 471
Location: Glasgow

PostPosted: Thu Jun 07, 2007 9:26 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Hi Freethekillie2

What has happened to my fruit bun? Moderator must have been Hungry today eh?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
freethekillie2



Joined: 27 Apr 2007
Posts: 309

PostPosted: Thu Jun 07, 2007 9:31 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

wullie the bun must have been good. hector dick ate it lol, and then told the scrap man he was a liar . like all miscarriaiges the crown will let you down, god its fields of athenry again,where is truth where is justice where are the lies.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Big Wullie



Joined: 25 Apr 2007
Posts: 471
Location: Glasgow

PostPosted: Fri Jun 08, 2007 12:42 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Freethekillie2
To quote the reference directly from the Scotsman, he was an apple short of a picnic.
There is also the reference that three High court Judges found him, Entirely Credible.
Shows how he pulled the whool over their eyes eh? But surely Fraser had a part to play in this too as he was responsible for using this man.
I will quote again Lord Fraser is quoted himself as saying Gauci wasn't the full shilling, I dont know why the moderator saw fit to remove this comment. If the lord Advocate can voice his opinion in this way then so too can we.
See link

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Peter_Fraser,_Baron_Fraser_of_Carmyllie
Also noticeable about Fraser is the fact that he was charged and dragged off a plane But no surprise Charges were dropped.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/scotland/tayside_and_central/6197575.stm
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
freethekillie2



Joined: 27 Apr 2007
Posts: 309

PostPosted: Fri Jun 08, 2007 1:31 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

GAUCI, WAS A SALESMAN AND IF YOU BELIEVE THE CONSPIRACIES AROUND IT WAS PAYED BY THE CIA, TO GET A CONVICTION ON THE INNOCENT MAN IN GREENOCK NICK. LIKE MANY MISCARRIAGES WHERE INNOCENT MEN WOMAN, AND EVEN MEN WHO ARE OUT STILL FIGHTING THE SYSTEM.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Big Wullie



Joined: 25 Apr 2007
Posts: 471
Location: Glasgow

PostPosted: Tue Jun 26, 2007 3:38 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

NB. This posting has been removed as it is the moderator's view that it does not relate to this subject and a similar posting has already been made under 'Are SCCRC independent enough.....'

Please find enclosed link to latest you-tube video
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    shirleymckie.myfastforum.org Forum Index -> Test Forum 1 All times are GMT
Goto page 1, 2, 3, 4  Next
Page 1 of 4

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum

Card File  Gallery  Forum Archive
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
Create your own free forum | Buy a domain to use with your forum
Thanks to everyone who has supported Shirley over the years.Current Accounts|Personal Loans