shirleymckie.myfastforum.org

Big Wullie · Joined: 25 Apr 2007 Posts: 1149 Location: Glasgow

Could this be the evidence hidden by our Scottish Courts in the case of Lockerbie:

The Lumpert Affidavit
On Friday Aug. 31, I received from Edwin Bollier, head of the Zurich-based MeBo AG, a copy of a German original of an affidavit.

The document is dated July 18, 2007, and signed by Ulrich Lumpert, who worked as an electronic engineer at MeBo from 1978 to 1994. I have scrutinized the document carefully and concluded that I have no reason to doubt its authenticity or the truthfulness of its content.

Lumpert was a key witness at the Camp Zeist trial, where a three-judge panel convicted a Libyan citizen of murdering 270 persons who died in the bombing of Pan Am 103 over Lockerbie.

In his testimony, Lumpert stated that “of the 3 pieces of hand-made prototypes MST-13 Timer PC-Boards, the third MST-13 PC-Board was broken and [he] had thrown it away.”

In his affidavit, certified by Officer Walter Wieland, Lumpert admits having committed perjury.

“I confirm today on July 18th 2007, that I stole the third hand-manufactured MST-13 Timer PC-Board consisting of 8 layers of fibre-glass from MEBO Ltd. and gave it without permission on June 22nd 1989 to a person officially investigating in the Lockerbie case,” Lumpert wrote.

“It did not escape me that the MST-13 fragment shown [at the Lockerbie trial] on the police photograph No PT/35(b) came from the non-operational MST-13 prototype PC-board that I had stolen,” Lumpert added.

“I am sorry for the consequences of my silence at that time, for the innocent Libyan Mr. Abdelbaset Al Megrahi sentenced to life imprisonment, and for the country of Libya.”

Lumpert has agreed to speak with me in order to provide some explanations as to what exactly happened, and why he has decided to speak out regarding his role in the fabrication of the evidence.

The above article can be found here:

http://canadafreepress.com/index.php/article/6529

Where it can also be seen that Bollier was presented with three different Timers.
He heavily criticised the first for not having any solder on it so therefore had never been used.

Seems the evidence was more manufactured than we first thought eh ?

Apparently the Expert instrumental in the conviction of Megrahi has also been severely criticised and Heavily Discredited in another three cases, See here:

Alan Feraday has been totally discredited in the following cases:

The 1982 Hide Park Bomb

The John Berry Case

And lastly: The Hassan Assali Case which can all be found here:

http://canadafreepress.com/index.php/article/5542

Reminds me of the more known Sir Roy Meadows here in the Angela Canning and Sally Clark cases

From the first article came the following comment

scotkaz · Joined: 28 Aug 2008 Posts: 527

Why did Megrahi have a three judge panel at trial and not a jury?

I dont like three judge panels at all.

15 heads are better that 3.

Big Wullie · Joined: 25 Apr 2007 Posts: 1149 Location: Glasgow

New Forensic Tests Proof Of Innocence

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/a...-convicted-Lockerbie-bombing.html

New forensic analysis on a fragment of the timing device alleged to have triggered the bomb that brought down Pan Am jet 103 on December 21, 1988, is said to have found no trace of explosive residue.

Last night, a source close to the investigation said: ‘The only piece of forensic evidence in the chain that pointed to Libyan guilt has never been near the seat of an explosion.’